Multicentre Surveillance of Candida Species from Blood Cultures during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Southern Europe (CANCoVEU Project).

Introduction: Surveillance of Candida species isolates from blood cultures (BCs) in Europe is considered fragmented, unable to allow the definition of targets of antifungal stewardship recommendations especially during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: We performed a multicentric retrospective study including all consecutive BC Candida isolates from six Southern European tertiary hospitals (1st January 2020 to 31st December 2021). Etiology, antifungal susceptibility patterns, and clinical setting were analyzed and compared. Results: C. albicans was the dominant species (45.1%), while C. auris was undetected. Candida species positive BC events increased significantly in COVID-19 ICUs in 2021 but decreased in other ICUs. Resistance to azole increased significantly and remained very high in C. albicans (fluconazole from 0.7% to 4.5%, p = 0.03) and C. parapsilosis complex (fluconazole up to 24.5% and voriconazole up to 8.9%), respectively. Resistance to caspofungin was remarkable in C. tropicalis (10%) and C. krusei (20%), while resistance to at least one echinocandin increased in 2021, especially in C. parapsilosis complex (from 0.8% to 5.1%, p = 0.05). Although no significant differences were observed over the study period, fluconazole and echinocandin resistance increased in COVID-19 ICUs by up to 14% and 5.8%, respectively, but remained undetected in non-intensive COVID-19 wards. Conclusions: Antifungal stewardship activities aimed at monitoring resistance to echinocandin in C. tropicalis and C. krusei, and against the spread of fluconazole resistant C. parapsilosis complex isolates are highly desirable. In COVID-19 patients, antifungal resistance was mostly present when the illness had a critical course.

Implementation of Chromatic Super CAZ/AVI® medium for active surveillance of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance: preventing the loop from becoming a spiral.

Acquired resistance towards ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is increasingly reported. Several mechanisms can be involved, but mutations in the Ω-loop region of ß-lactamases are the most described. Herein, we assessed the implementation of Chromatic Super CAZ/AVI® medium in rectal swab surveillance cultures in a geographic area with endemic distribution of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Routine rectal swabs collected from the intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients were screened for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative organisms (CR-GN) and CAZ-AVI-resistant organisms by Chromatic CRE and Super CAZ/AVI® media. Among the 1839 patients screened, 146 (7.9%) were found to be colonized by one or more CPE and/or CR-GN isolates during hospitalization. Overall, among colonized patients the most common bacteria encountered were KPC-producing Enterobacterales (n = 60; 41.1%), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 41; 28.1%) and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (n = 34; 23.3%). Among patients colonized by KPC-producing Enterobacterales, thirty-five (58.3%) had CAZ-AVI-resistant strains. A 30.5% rate of faecal carriage of CAZ-AVI-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae, substantially higher than that of susceptible isolates (2.8%), was observed in the COVID-19 ICU. Prevalence of faecal carriage of metallo-ß-lactamase-producing organisms was low (0.5% and 0.2% for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, respectively). Chromatic Super CAZ/AVI® medium showed 100% sensitivity in detecting CPE or CR-GN isolates resistant to CAZ-AVI regardless of both MIC values and carbapenemase content. Specificity was 86.8%. The Chromatic Super CAZ/AVI® medium might be implemented in rectal swab surveillance cultures for identification of patients carrying CAZ-AVI-resistant organisms to contain the spread of these difficult-to-treat pathogens.

Occurrence of multi-carbapenemases producers among carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and in vitro activity of combinations including cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and aztreonam in the COVID-19 era.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of multi-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (EB) and the activity of cefiderocol (CFDC), meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), and combinations of CZA plus aztreonam (ATM), MEV plus ATM and CFDC plus CZA against them. METHODS: A collection of carbapenemase-producing EB clinical isolates (n = 1242) was investigated by lateral flow immunoassay NG-Test CARBA-5 and molecular testing. Cefiderocol MICs were determined using broth microdilution SensititreTM panel. MICs of CZA and MEV were determined by the gradient diffusion method. Antimicrobial synergy testing was performed using gradient diffusion strip crossing. RESULTS: KPC were the most frequent carbapenemases (83.2%), followed by VIM (9.2 %), OXA-48-like (4.3 %) and NDM enzymes (4.1%). Multi-carbapenemase producers were found in 10 (0.8%) isolates. Three combinations of two different carbapenemases were observed: KPC+VIM (n = 4), NDM+OXA-48-like (n = 4), and VIM+OXA-48-like (n = 2). CFDC showed potent activity against eight out of ten dual-carbapenemases producers, while resistance or reduced susceptibility was shown towards CZA and MEV. CFDC in combination with CZA showed no synergistic effects and only two additive effects on seven (87.5%) of the CFDC-susceptible strains. Conversely, CZA plus ATM and MEV plus ATM combinations were synergistic against all ATM-resistant strains regardless of dual-carbapenemases phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of multi-carbapenemase producers is not uncommon in Northern Italy area. MEV in combination with ATM might be considered as a potential therapeutic option, alternative to CZA plus ATM. CFDC susceptibility testing and synergy evaluation of ATM-based combinations should be performed in the lab routine to evaluate the most in vitro active antimicrobial regimen.